https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384190 The case involved allegations of clandestine clearance of 'automobile paints/coats' under the brand name 'SUNLAC'. The appellant contested the reliance on lateral evidence and claimed exemption under a notification. The court found the confirmation of demand weak due to lack of corroborated evidence and violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration to ensure fairness and proper examination of all relevant evidence, emphasizing the right to cross-examine witnesses. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2019 07:46:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384190 The case involved allegations of clandestine clearance of 'automobile paints/coats' under the brand name 'SUNLAC'. The appellant contested the reliance on lateral evidence and claimed exemption under a notification. The court found the confirmation of demand weak due to lack of corroborated evidence and violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration to ensure fairness and proper examination of all relevant evidence, emphasizing the right to cross-examine witnesses. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384190