<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 378 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384189</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. It emphasized the need to verify whether Cenvat credit was availed on the materials generating waste and scrap, highlighting the importance of establishing the absence of such credit. The issue of limitation was left open for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 07:45:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 378 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384189</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. It emphasized the need to verify whether Cenvat credit was availed on the materials generating waste and scrap, highlighting the importance of establishing the absence of such credit. The issue of limitation was left open for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>