<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1677 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the main application to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Wipro Limited, as it determined that the claim had not converted into a debt and a dispute existed between the parties. The Tribunal emphasized that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is not intended for chasing payments and highlighted that the fundamental requirement for initiating CIRP, the existence of a default, was disputed in this case. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 18:47:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1677 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the main application to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Wipro Limited, as it determined that the claim had not converted into a debt and a dispute existed between the parties. The Tribunal emphasized that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is not intended for chasing payments and highlighted that the fundamental requirement for initiating CIRP, the existence of a default, was disputed in this case. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>