<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1504 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to treat repair and maintenance expenses as revenue expenditure, delete the disallowance under Section 14A, and delete the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii). The decision highlighted the significance of expenses&#039; nature and purpose in classification and stressed the need for proper satisfaction and evidence in disallowance determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 18:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1504 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to treat repair and maintenance expenses as revenue expenditure, delete the disallowance under Section 14A, and delete the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii). The decision highlighted the significance of expenses&#039; nature and purpose in classification and stressed the need for proper satisfaction and evidence in disallowance determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>