https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282422 The statutory scheme treated the development corporation engaged in new town work as an agent of the State Government, not as the acquiring body. Government resolutions showed that compensation and enhancement liabilities were to be borne by the State, while the corporation was authorised only to represent the State in the land acquisition reference. Section 50 of the Land Acquisition Act permitted participation by the authority bearing acquisition expenses, but the financial burden remained with the State. On that basis, the corporation was not a necessary or proper party to the reference, and the impleadment order was correctly set aside. en-us Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Aug 2019 17:07:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282422 The statutory scheme treated the development corporation engaged in new town work as an agent of the State Government, not as the acquiring body. Government resolutions showed that compensation and enhancement liabilities were to be borne by the State, while the corporation was authorised only to represent the State in the land acquisition reference. Section 50 of the Land Acquisition Act permitted participation by the authority bearing acquisition expenses, but the financial burden remained with the State. On that basis, the corporation was not a necessary or proper party to the reference, and the impleadment order was correctly set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282422