https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282420 A succeeding Wealth-tax Officer was not required to issue a fresh notice before completing penalty proceedings where notice had already been issued by the original officer. The Court treated the earlier notice as sufficient for continuation of the same proceedings and held that the absence of a fresh notice by the successor did not vitiate the penalty order. It nevertheless declined to interfere on the facts and lapse of time, and the appeals were disposed of without interference. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Aug 2019 12:27:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282420 A succeeding Wealth-tax Officer was not required to issue a fresh notice before completing penalty proceedings where notice had already been issued by the original officer. The Court treated the earlier notice as sufficient for continuation of the same proceedings and held that the absence of a fresh notice by the successor did not vitiate the penalty order. It nevertheless declined to interfere on the facts and lapse of time, and the appeals were disposed of without interference. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282420