https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384150 The court upheld its jurisdiction despite a challenge, citing the partial cause of action within its territory. It refused to dismiss the petitioner for delay in filing, noting authorities' communication lapses. The court criticized the incorrect service of orders, hindering the petitioner's appeal rights. Penalizing the petitioner for delays caused by authorities was deemed unjust. The penalty for delayed submission of certificates was set aside as not the petitioner's fault. Despite compliance, the petitioner was penalized for delays beyond its control, leading the court to rule in favor of the petitioner and set aside the impugned orders. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384150 The court upheld its jurisdiction despite a challenge, citing the partial cause of action within its territory. It refused to dismiss the petitioner for delay in filing, noting authorities' communication lapses. The court criticized the incorrect service of orders, hindering the petitioner's appeal rights. Penalizing the petitioner for delays caused by authorities was deemed unjust. The penalty for delayed submission of certificates was set aside as not the petitioner's fault. Despite compliance, the petitioner was penalized for delays beyond its control, leading the court to rule in favor of the petitioner and set aside the impugned orders. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384150