<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 338 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384149</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras disposed of the writ petitions by directing the respondent to assess the Bills of Entry in accordance with the orders of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) within a specified timeframe. The court emphasized compliance with the declared invoice value for the imported furniture items and did not award costs to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:55:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 338 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384149</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras disposed of the writ petitions by directing the respondent to assess the Bills of Entry in accordance with the orders of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) within a specified timeframe. The court emphasized compliance with the declared invoice value for the imported furniture items and did not award costs to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>