<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1428 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed various tax-related issues in the case, ruling in favor of the assessee on certain matters such as disallowance under Section 14A and deletion of additions for unutilized MODVAT credit and bad debt written-off. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of non-compete fees paid to ex-directors and interest on advances to subsidiary companies. The judgment emphasized following legal precedents and statutory provisions for a balanced resolution of the disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1428 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed various tax-related issues in the case, ruling in favor of the assessee on certain matters such as disallowance under Section 14A and deletion of additions for unutilized MODVAT credit and bad debt written-off. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of non-compete fees paid to ex-directors and interest on advances to subsidiary companies. The judgment emphasized following legal precedents and statutory provisions for a balanced resolution of the disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>