<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 333 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384144</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras set aside the rejection of objections to a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Assessing Officer failed to consider the merits raised by the Assessee, violating principles outlined in the GKN Driveshafts case. The Court remanded the matter for proper consideration of objections and directed the respondent to pass a speaking order within six weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 333 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384144</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras set aside the rejection of objections to a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Assessing Officer failed to consider the merits raised by the Assessee, violating principles outlined in the GKN Driveshafts case. The Court remanded the matter for proper consideration of objections and directed the respondent to pass a speaking order within six weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>