https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384138 Interference with a bail order requires more than a reappraisal of the merits; the order will not be disturbed unless the discretion exercised is shown to be illegal or arbitrary. In a PMLA matter, the Court noted that the case rested on documentary material, investigation was complete, complaints had been filed, and co-accused were already on bail. It further held that the earlier bail embargo under Section 45(1) of the PMLA could not govern the matter after that provision had been declared unconstitutional. Finding no material showing discriminatory or perverse exercise of discretion, the Court upheld the bail orders and declined interference. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384138 Interference with a bail order requires more than a reappraisal of the merits; the order will not be disturbed unless the discretion exercised is shown to be illegal or arbitrary. In a PMLA matter, the Court noted that the case rested on documentary material, investigation was complete, complaints had been filed, and co-accused were already on bail. It further held that the earlier bail embargo under Section 45(1) of the PMLA could not govern the matter after that provision had been declared unconstitutional. Finding no material showing discriminatory or perverse exercise of discretion, the Court upheld the bail orders and declined interference. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384138