<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1866 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282407</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the petition due to significant disputes over the quality of goods and the settlement of operational debt. The ongoing resolution process and existence of disputes led to the conclusion that the petition could not be admitted under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. No order was made regarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 20:29:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1866 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282407</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the petition due to significant disputes over the quality of goods and the settlement of operational debt. The ongoing resolution process and existence of disputes led to the conclusion that the petition could not be admitted under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. No order was made regarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>