<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1786 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282410</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on the legal question whether an assessee may use CENVAT credit on input services such as telephone and courier to pay service tax on agency commission classified as insurance auxiliary services. The order identifies the entitlement to set off input-service credit against the tax liability on that service category as the sole issue for determination, but it records no final ruling on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 20:29:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1786 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282410</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on the legal question whether an assessee may use CENVAT credit on input services such as telephone and courier to pay service tax on agency commission classified as insurance auxiliary services. The order identifies the entitlement to set off input-service credit against the tax liability on that service category as the sole issue for determination, but it records no final ruling on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>