https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384110 The Court modified the stay condition in response to the petitioner's substantial compliance with deposit requirements, allowing for a stay on orders and directing the petitioner to execute a bond for the remaining amount within a specified timeline. The judgment clarified issues surrounding statutory appeals, stay orders, compliance with deposit conditions, and the modification of stay conditions based on adherence to requirements. The Court's decision emphasized the importance of fulfilling deposit obligations and set a timeframe for the appeal's resolution by the Tribunal or second respondent. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2019 08:13:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384110 The Court modified the stay condition in response to the petitioner's substantial compliance with deposit requirements, allowing for a stay on orders and directing the petitioner to execute a bond for the remaining amount within a specified timeline. The judgment clarified issues surrounding statutory appeals, stay orders, compliance with deposit conditions, and the modification of stay conditions based on adherence to requirements. The Court's decision emphasized the importance of fulfilling deposit obligations and set a timeframe for the appeal's resolution by the Tribunal or second respondent. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384110