<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 272 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384083</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, overturning the Registrar of Companies&#039; rejection of his resignation from the company due to non-compliance issues. The petitioner&#039;s disqualification as a director under the Companies Act, 2013 was revoked, and his Director Identification Number (DIN) and Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) were restored. The court clarified that the requirement for filing Form DIR-11 did not apply at the time of the petitioner&#039;s resignation, leading to the setting aside of the rejection order. ROC was directed to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s case, ensuring his compliance and reinstatement as a director.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 08:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 272 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384083</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, overturning the Registrar of Companies&#039; rejection of his resignation from the company due to non-compliance issues. The petitioner&#039;s disqualification as a director under the Companies Act, 2013 was revoked, and his Director Identification Number (DIN) and Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) were restored. The court clarified that the requirement for filing Form DIR-11 did not apply at the time of the petitioner&#039;s resignation, leading to the setting aside of the rejection order. ROC was directed to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s case, ensuring his compliance and reinstatement as a director.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>