https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384060 The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal of the accused in a case challenging the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the complainant's evidence insufficient to prove the debt or cheque execution, highlighting inconsistencies and lack of corroboration. Emphasizing the burden on the accused to rebut the presumption under Section 139, the court dismissed the appeal, stressing the need for compelling circumstances to interfere with an acquittal. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2019 06:35:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384060 The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal of the accused in a case challenging the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the complainant's evidence insufficient to prove the debt or cheque execution, highlighting inconsistencies and lack of corroboration. Emphasizing the burden on the accused to rebut the presumption under Section 139, the court dismissed the appeal, stressing the need for compelling circumstances to interfere with an acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384060