<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1451 - ITAT BANGALORE  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the items sold were the same as those declared under VDIS. The Tribunal accepted the evidence presented, including conversion records and sales documentation, which demonstrated a match in quantities and items. Consequently, the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deemed unjustified, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 20:16:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1451 - ITAT BANGALORE  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the items sold were the same as those declared under VDIS. The Tribunal accepted the evidence presented, including conversion records and sales documentation, which demonstrated a match in quantities and items. Consequently, the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deemed unjustified, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>