<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1361 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282383</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenged the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Income-tax Act and the fee notices issued under it. Pending consideration of those grounds, the HC kept coercive enforcement of the impugned notices in abeyance to protect the petitioner and allowed the respondents to file a counter. Interim stay was granted against enforcement of the notices until further orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 20:16:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1361 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282383</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenged the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Income-tax Act and the fee notices issued under it. Pending consideration of those grounds, the HC kept coercive enforcement of the impugned notices in abeyance to protect the petitioner and allowed the respondents to file a counter. Interim stay was granted against enforcement of the notices until further orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>