<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1844 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282381</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, reversing the lower authorities&#039; decision, by holding that the commission payment to the non-resident entity was not taxable in India. The Tribunal determined that the services were rendered and utilized outside India, and there was no permanent establishment in India, thus negating tax liability under Section 40(a)(i) for the Assessment Year 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1844 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282381</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, reversing the lower authorities&#039; decision, by holding that the commission payment to the non-resident entity was not taxable in India. The Tribunal determined that the services were rendered and utilized outside India, and there was no permanent establishment in India, thus negating tax liability under Section 40(a)(i) for the Assessment Year 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>