<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1471 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282380</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes regarding the adjudication of Ground Nos. 10 and 13. The Tribunal directed the AO to grant the benefit of a +/-5% range to the assessee and correct the incorrect computation of Transfer Pricing Adjustment based on the principle of proportionality in benchmarking international transactions with AEs. The decision emphasized consistency with past precedents and judicial discipline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 20:16:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1471 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282380</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes regarding the adjudication of Ground Nos. 10 and 13. The Tribunal directed the AO to grant the benefit of a +/-5% range to the assessee and correct the incorrect computation of Transfer Pricing Adjustment based on the principle of proportionality in benchmarking international transactions with AEs. The decision emphasized consistency with past precedents and judicial discipline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>