<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 9 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19248</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled that dividend income from shares transferred to a trust for a minor, with benefits deferred until the minor reached majority, should not be included in the assessee&#039;s income under section 64(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the trust deed provisions and the delayed benefit to the minor were key considerations in the application of the tax provision. The decision aligned with previous judicial interpretations and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s ruling in favor of the assessee, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument that the deferred benefit to the minor triggered section 64(1)(v).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 9 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19248</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled that dividend income from shares transferred to a trust for a minor, with benefits deferred until the minor reached majority, should not be included in the assessee&#039;s income under section 64(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the trust deed provisions and the delayed benefit to the minor were key considerations in the application of the tax provision. The decision aligned with previous judicial interpretations and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s ruling in favor of the assessee, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument that the deferred benefit to the minor triggered section 64(1)(v).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>