<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 235 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384046</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the additional income declared was based on incriminating materials found during the search. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, confirming the penalties and emphasizing the significance of seized materials in determining penalty applicability under Explanation 5A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2019 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 235 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384046</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the additional income declared was based on incriminating materials found during the search. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, confirming the penalties and emphasizing the significance of seized materials in determining penalty applicability under Explanation 5A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>