https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384027 A writ petition under Article 226/227 was not entertained because an alternate efficacious statutory appeal under FEMA was available. The High Court declined to examine the challenge to the Adjudicating Authority's order on merits and granted the petitioners liberty to approach the Special Director (Appeals). The Court noted that issues relating to service, timing of filing, limitation, and any request for condonation were matters for the appellate authority to decide. All contentions were expressly left open for that forum. en-us Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Aug 2019 07:49:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384027 A writ petition under Article 226/227 was not entertained because an alternate efficacious statutory appeal under FEMA was available. The High Court declined to examine the challenge to the Adjudicating Authority's order on merits and granted the petitioners liberty to approach the Special Director (Appeals). The Court noted that issues relating to service, timing of filing, limitation, and any request for condonation were matters for the appellate authority to decide. All contentions were expressly left open for that forum. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384027