<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 213 - ATFEMA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384024</link>
    <description>A retracted confessional statement, standing alone, cannot sustain penal action under FERA unless it is substantially corroborated by independent and cogent evidence. The Tribunal found that the only material against the appellant was an earlier confession later retracted, and the record disclosed no independent evidence linking the appellant to the alleged transactions or the relevant NRE account. In the absence of corroboration, the penalty was unsustainable. The adjudication order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 07:49:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 213 - ATFEMA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384024</link>
      <description>A retracted confessional statement, standing alone, cannot sustain penal action under FERA unless it is substantially corroborated by independent and cogent evidence. The Tribunal found that the only material against the appellant was an earlier confession later retracted, and the record disclosed no independent evidence linking the appellant to the alleged transactions or the relevant NRE account. In the absence of corroboration, the penalty was unsustainable. The adjudication order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>