<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 203 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority to determine the nature of the goods on which duty is liable for the short receipt and decide under which provision the demand is sustainable. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying relevant provisions of the law and ensuring clarity on the nature of goods before confirming duty demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 07:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 203 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority to determine the nature of the goods on which duty is liable for the short receipt and decide under which provision the demand is sustainable. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying relevant provisions of the law and ensuring clarity on the nature of goods before confirming duty demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>