<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 37 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19239</link>
    <description>Payment made to customs authorities as a penalty in lieu of confiscation for unauthorised import was not deductible as business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Bombay HC treated the outlay as a penalty arising from an infraction of law, not a compensatory or revenue expense incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Accordingly, the deduction claim failed and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:08:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 37 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19239</link>
      <description>Payment made to customs authorities as a penalty in lieu of confiscation for unauthorised import was not deductible as business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Bombay HC treated the outlay as a penalty arising from an infraction of law, not a compensatory or revenue expense incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Accordingly, the deduction claim failed and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>