<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1244 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282348</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271D for the alleged contravention of section 269SS, emphasizing the genuine and bonafide nature of the transactions. The Tribunal found the cash transactions with the relative to be genuine and without tax implications, concluding that no penalty should be levied due to the bonafide belief in compliance and the nature of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 16:01:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1244 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282348</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271D for the alleged contravention of section 269SS, emphasizing the genuine and bonafide nature of the transactions. The Tribunal found the cash transactions with the relative to be genuine and without tax implications, concluding that no penalty should be levied due to the bonafide belief in compliance and the nature of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>