<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1603 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was held that since the undisclosed income was disclosed in the return and no addition was made during assessment, the penalty was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty provisions apply based on the return of income and found no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals in all nine cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 16:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1603 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was held that since the undisclosed income was disclosed in the return and no addition was made during assessment, the penalty was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty provisions apply based on the return of income and found no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals in all nine cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>