<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19234</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in considering additional evidence at the appellate stage in a best judgment assessment proceeding under section 144 of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal should have assessed the Income-tax Officer&#039;s judgment based on available materials. The case was remitted to the Tribunal for a fresh hearing and disposal, with a directive to consider the assessee&#039;s conduct in assessing the Officer&#039;s estimates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:30:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19234</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in considering additional evidence at the appellate stage in a best judgment assessment proceeding under section 144 of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal should have assessed the Income-tax Officer&#039;s judgment based on available materials. The case was remitted to the Tribunal for a fresh hearing and disposal, with a directive to consider the assessee&#039;s conduct in assessing the Officer&#039;s estimates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>