<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 323 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282342</link>
    <description>In an enquiry for an offence triable exclusively by the Court of Session, the Magistrate must call upon the complainant to produce and examine the witnesses relied on, but is not required to independently summon every person named in the complaint. Cognizance may validly rest on the statements of the witnesses actually produced and examined, so the order is not vitiated merely because some named witnesses were left out. A challenge under Section 482 CrPC must also be brought within a reasonable time; where the petition was filed after substantial delay, the court treated it as belated and declined interference with the cognizance order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2019 15:28:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 323 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282342</link>
      <description>In an enquiry for an offence triable exclusively by the Court of Session, the Magistrate must call upon the complainant to produce and examine the witnesses relied on, but is not required to independently summon every person named in the complaint. Cognizance may validly rest on the statements of the witnesses actually produced and examined, so the order is not vitiated merely because some named witnesses were left out. A challenge under Section 482 CrPC must also be brought within a reasonable time; where the petition was filed after substantial delay, the court treated it as belated and declined interference with the cognizance order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>