https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282339 The court found the foreign judgment and decree obtained fraudulently and without proper service of summons to be non-conclusive under Section 13(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure. It asserted territorial jurisdiction to try the suit, emphasizing the plaintiff's residence and work in Delhi. The court deemed the suit maintainable, rejecting objections to its execution. As the foreign judgment lacked merits, it was not upheld under Section 13(b) CPC. The plea of limitation was dismissed due to insufficient evidence. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent injunction against enforcing the foreign decree and dismissing the execution petition. en-us Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2019 11:58:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282339 The court found the foreign judgment and decree obtained fraudulently and without proper service of summons to be non-conclusive under Section 13(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure. It asserted territorial jurisdiction to try the suit, emphasizing the plaintiff's residence and work in Delhi. The court deemed the suit maintainable, rejecting objections to its execution. As the foreign judgment lacked merits, it was not upheld under Section 13(b) CPC. The plea of limitation was dismissed due to insufficient evidence. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent injunction against enforcing the foreign decree and dismissing the execution petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282339