<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19231</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee for the assessment year 1981-82, finding that the assessment was made within the extended period of limitation. However, for the assessment year 1982-83, the Court sided with the assessee, concluding that the interest on the fixed deposit did not accrue during the relevant year, and its inclusion in the total income was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:22:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19231</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee for the assessment year 1981-82, finding that the assessment was made within the extended period of limitation. However, for the assessment year 1982-83, the Court sided with the assessee, concluding that the interest on the fixed deposit did not accrue during the relevant year, and its inclusion in the total income was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>