<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19228</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restore the assessment under Section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, finding the house was exclusively used for residential purposes despite the assessee being a non-resident. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument for a stricter interpretation, emphasizing a pragmatic approach. The court required the Assessing Officer to reconsider the assessment, considering all relevant information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:16:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19228</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restore the assessment under Section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, finding the house was exclusively used for residential purposes despite the assessee being a non-resident. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument for a stricter interpretation, emphasizing a pragmatic approach. The court required the Assessing Officer to reconsider the assessment, considering all relevant information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>