<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 162 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383973</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 3,10,02,580/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2013-14. The decision clarified the scope of the penalty provision, emphasizing that penalties should consider different proceedings beyond assessment, and highlighted the importance of interpreting Explanation 4 to Section 271(1)(c) in determining penalty applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2019 09:05:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 162 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383973</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 3,10,02,580/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2013-14. The decision clarified the scope of the penalty provision, emphasizing that penalties should consider different proceedings beyond assessment, and highlighted the importance of interpreting Explanation 4 to Section 271(1)(c) in determining penalty applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>