<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 161 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383972</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by answering the substantial question of law in favor of the assessee and against the revenue. The court confirmed the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in the case, aligning with the findings of a previous judgment. The assessee was found entitled to the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, even after the merger of firms, based on fulfilling the conditions specified in the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 161 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383972</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by answering the substantial question of law in favor of the assessee and against the revenue. The court confirmed the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in the case, aligning with the findings of a previous judgment. The assessee was found entitled to the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, even after the merger of firms, based on fulfilling the conditions specified in the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>