https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383950 Under COFEPOSA, contemporaneous service of the grounds of detention and relied upon documents within the statutory time limit satisfies Article 22(5) and Section 3(3); identical same-day delivery is not required, and executive guidelines cannot narrow the statutory scheme. In a detention case involving a person already in custody, the order remains valid if the grounds show awareness of custody, material indicating a real possibility of release on bail, and subjective satisfaction that prejudicial activity may continue on release. On these principles, the High Court's quashing of the detention orders was found unsustainable and the preventive detention orders were restored as valid. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Dec 2025 12:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383950 Under COFEPOSA, contemporaneous service of the grounds of detention and relied upon documents within the statutory time limit satisfies Article 22(5) and Section 3(3); identical same-day delivery is not required, and executive guidelines cannot narrow the statutory scheme. In a detention case involving a person already in custody, the order remains valid if the grounds show awareness of custody, material indicating a real possibility of release on bail, and subjective satisfaction that prejudicial activity may continue on release. On these principles, the High Court's quashing of the detention orders was found unsustainable and the preventive detention orders were restored as valid. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383950