<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 37 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19223</link>
    <description>A registered conveyance deed was not required for transfer of Government-owned buildings where the transfer proceeded by Government grant, and ownership was treated as effective without registration. On that basis, the assessee was regarded as owner for depreciation purposes, and depreciation on the buildings was allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:54:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 37 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19223</link>
      <description>A registered conveyance deed was not required for transfer of Government-owned buildings where the transfer proceeded by Government grant, and ownership was treated as effective without registration. On that basis, the assessee was regarded as owner for depreciation purposes, and depreciation on the buildings was allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>