https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383940 The Tribunal set aside the demand for CENVAT Credit reversal against M/s. Etrans Solutions Private Limited, holding their compliance with Rule 6(3)(ii) sufficient. The Tribunal ruled that Rule 6(3)(i) did not apply when credit was reversed with interest, emphasizing consistency in adjudication within the jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed, and the lower authority's decision was deemed unsustainable. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383940 The Tribunal set aside the demand for CENVAT Credit reversal against M/s. Etrans Solutions Private Limited, holding their compliance with Rule 6(3)(ii) sufficient. The Tribunal ruled that Rule 6(3)(i) did not apply when credit was reversed with interest, emphasizing consistency in adjudication within the jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed, and the lower authority's decision was deemed unsustainable. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383940