https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383939 The appeals were initially dismissed for non-prosecution due to the repeated absence of the appellants, leading to restoration following their explanation for the absences. Despite multiple adjournments sought by the appellants, concerns arose over their commitment to the case. A lack of Vakalatnama for Proxy Counsel prompted a further adjournment request, viewed as a delay tactic. The Tribunal observed a deliberate delay pattern by the appellants, culminating in the dismissal of appeals for non-prosecution due to their continuous delays and lack of genuine effort in pursuing the matter effectively. en-us Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2019 07:36:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383939 The appeals were initially dismissed for non-prosecution due to the repeated absence of the appellants, leading to restoration following their explanation for the absences. Despite multiple adjournments sought by the appellants, concerns arose over their commitment to the case. A lack of Vakalatnama for Proxy Counsel prompted a further adjournment request, viewed as a delay tactic. The Tribunal observed a deliberate delay pattern by the appellants, culminating in the dismissal of appeals for non-prosecution due to their continuous delays and lack of genuine effort in pursuing the matter effectively. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383939