https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383933 The Court declined interference with a revised assessment where the revisional notice had expressly proposed assessment and penalty, the dealer had responded, and the alleged opportunity defect was not made out. It further held that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked in tax matters when the TNVAT Act provides an efficacious statutory appeal, with questions such as pre-deposit, limitation, and condonation to be decided by the appellate authority. The assessment was left undisturbed, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2019 07:30:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383933 The Court declined interference with a revised assessment where the revisional notice had expressly proposed assessment and penalty, the dealer had responded, and the alleged opportunity defect was not made out. It further held that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked in tax matters when the TNVAT Act provides an efficacious statutory appeal, with questions such as pre-deposit, limitation, and condonation to be decided by the appellate authority. The assessment was left undisturbed, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383933