<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1469 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer, citing lack of application of mind, vague reasons, and reliance on insufficient information. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the Assessing Officer to record satisfaction independently before issuing notices for reassessment. The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid and without jurisdiction, leading to the Tribunal allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal on 4.10.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2019 06:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1469 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer, citing lack of application of mind, vague reasons, and reliance on insufficient information. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the Assessing Officer to record satisfaction independently before issuing notices for reassessment. The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid and without jurisdiction, leading to the Tribunal allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal on 4.10.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>