https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282325 Declared transaction value was rejected after a Rule 10A notice under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, and the importer did not provide an effective response to displace that rejection. The original authority then re-determined assessable value under Rule 8 after finding the earlier valuation rules inapplicable. On the record, no material was produced to undermine either the rejection of the declared value or the resort to Rule 8 for valuation. The re-determination of assessable value was therefore upheld and the appeal failed. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2019 06:25:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282325 Declared transaction value was rejected after a Rule 10A notice under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, and the importer did not provide an effective response to displace that rejection. The original authority then re-determined assessable value under Rule 8 after finding the earlier valuation rules inapplicable. On the record, no material was produced to undermine either the rejection of the declared value or the resort to Rule 8 for valuation. The re-determination of assessable value was therefore upheld and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282325