<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1661 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO/TPO to benchmark the arm&#039;s length price as per the Resale Price Method (RPM) after including two comparables in the final list. The Tribunal emphasized that RPM is the most suitable method for benchmarking international transactions of a pure trader without value addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2019 06:25:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1661 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO/TPO to benchmark the arm&#039;s length price as per the Resale Price Method (RPM) after including two comparables in the final list. The Tribunal emphasized that RPM is the most suitable method for benchmarking international transactions of a pure trader without value addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>