<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 105 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383916</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by deleting the disallowance of accounts writing charges and remitting the issue of HUF income back to the AO for further verification. However, the ITAT upheld the disallowance of rent paid and depreciation claimed on the flat in Mumbai and the levy of interest under the relevant sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 105 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383916</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by deleting the disallowance of accounts writing charges and remitting the issue of HUF income back to the AO for further verification. However, the ITAT upheld the disallowance of rent paid and depreciation claimed on the flat in Mumbai and the levy of interest under the relevant sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>