<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 94 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383905</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the ex-parte re-assessment order and demand notice under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for the tax period 2012-2013. It found confusion in the jurisdiction of the officers for reassessment and noted that the petitioner had already cooperated with the authorities for the initial notice. The Court remitted the proceedings back to the appropriate authority for reassessment, directing the petitioner to appear and present objections, ensuring a fair process in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 94 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383905</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the ex-parte re-assessment order and demand notice under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for the tax period 2012-2013. It found confusion in the jurisdiction of the officers for reassessment and noted that the petitioner had already cooperated with the authorities for the initial notice. The Court remitted the proceedings back to the appropriate authority for reassessment, directing the petitioner to appear and present objections, ensuring a fair process in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>