https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383894 The Court set aside a communication challenging submissions related to the Central Excise Act issued during the pendency of appeals before CESTAT. The communication requested documents related to orders under appeal, which was deemed impermissible under the amended Section 35 of the CE Act. The Court preserved the respondent's right to issue a fresh communication for periods not covered by pending appeals before CESTAT. The writ petition was partly allowed with directions, and no costs were imposed, leading to the closure of the connected Miscellaneous Petition. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383894 The Court set aside a communication challenging submissions related to the Central Excise Act issued during the pendency of appeals before CESTAT. The communication requested documents related to orders under appeal, which was deemed impermissible under the amended Section 35 of the CE Act. The Court preserved the respondent's right to issue a fresh communication for periods not covered by pending appeals before CESTAT. The writ petition was partly allowed with directions, and no costs were imposed, leading to the closure of the connected Miscellaneous Petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383894