<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 77 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383888</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal challenging the rejection of their refund claim for interest on unfulfilled export obligations under the EPCG Scheme was successful. The Judicial Member found that the appellant had fulfilled the export obligation, obtained a redemption certificate, and highlighted procedural discrepancies in demanding interest. The rejection was deemed legally unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 77 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383888</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal challenging the rejection of their refund claim for interest on unfulfilled export obligations under the EPCG Scheme was successful. The Judicial Member found that the appellant had fulfilled the export obligation, obtained a redemption certificate, and highlighted procedural discrepancies in demanding interest. The rejection was deemed legally unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>