<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 73 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the Department was not justified in retaining the wrongfully appropriated amount once the demand was set aside. The decision emphasized the importance of refunding amounts appropriated towards demands deemed unlawful, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 73 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the Department was not justified in retaining the wrongfully appropriated amount once the demand was set aside. The decision emphasized the importance of refunding amounts appropriated towards demands deemed unlawful, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>