https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383882 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for further assessment. The decision emphasized the need to clarify if the demand for 506 MTs of MS Ingots was included in the initial show-cause notice, addressing concerns of overlapping demands and procedural fairness. The judgment focused on ensuring a detailed examination to resolve issues of alleged clandestine removal of goods and potential demand overlaps arising from multiple notices, underscoring the importance of procedural clarity in duty payment disputes. en-us Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Aug 2019 06:24:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383882 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for further assessment. The decision emphasized the need to clarify if the demand for 506 MTs of MS Ingots was included in the initial show-cause notice, addressing concerns of overlapping demands and procedural fairness. The judgment focused on ensuring a detailed examination to resolve issues of alleged clandestine removal of goods and potential demand overlaps arising from multiple notices, underscoring the importance of procedural clarity in duty payment disputes. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383882