<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 68 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383879</link>
    <description>A clarified or modified Letter of Permission that merely adds an item to the existing authorisation can satisfy Notification No. 52/2003-Cus., so imported goods covered by that modification were treated as within the authorised scope. The extended limitation period was unavailable because the dispute concerned interpretation of the exemption notification and there was no finding of suppression, wilful misstatement, or mala fide conduct. On that basis, the demand and impugned order were set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 68 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383879</link>
      <description>A clarified or modified Letter of Permission that merely adds an item to the existing authorisation can satisfy Notification No. 52/2003-Cus., so imported goods covered by that modification were treated as within the authorised scope. The extended limitation period was unavailable because the dispute concerned interpretation of the exemption notification and there was no finding of suppression, wilful misstatement, or mala fide conduct. On that basis, the demand and impugned order were set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>